MGS Executive Toolkit Collection · ET-020

Decision support tool

Organisation and Accountability Diagnostic

Identify overlaps, accountability gaps and decisions that nobody owns end to end.

Assess organisational clarity, capacity, coordination and accountability.

Editable XLSX file compatible with Excel, Numbers and Google Sheets.

When to use itBefore committing resources or closing a difficult-to-reverse decision.
What to prepareVerifiable evidence, owners, limits and alternatives.
What you will obtainTurn nominal organisation charts into verifiable responsibilities.

What problem it helps solve

Assess organisational clarity, capacity, coordination and accountability.

Questions to answer before deciding

  • Is the result expected from the role clear?
  • Is it clear what can be decided without escalation?
  • Is one person accountable for each result?
  • Are time and resources sufficient?
  • Does the role have the necessary knowledge and experience?

How the result is interpreted

The 0–100 result is calculated only from confirmed rows. Document completeness is shown separately so that a completed worksheet is not confused with a favourable decision.

What it does not replace

The tool structures a decision. It does not replace financial, legal, tax, technical or human review when specialist verification is required.

User guide

How to use the tool

1

Define the scope

Specify the decision or situation being assessed.

2

Record evidence

Use verifiable data and documents.

3

Score from 1 to 5

Use one consistent and justified scale.

4

Close with accountability

Assign a condition and owner before confirming a row.

Within the framework

Diagnose

This tool forms part of the MGS Strategic Intelligence Framework™ and should be interpreted together with evidence, limits and the review mechanism.

Further reading

  1. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press.
  2. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
  3. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Free Press.
  4. Kaplan, R. S. y Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Press.
  5. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.

Review methodology criteria, scoring and limitations.

Next step

When the tool identifies material exposure

Convert material gaps into a decision question, a verifiable scope and an expected outcome.